Chaos-proof delivery: shipping AI with TDD + CI
AI moves too fast for discipline? Reality: AI moves too fast without discipline. Here's how TDD and CI actually work for AI systems.
The myth
"AI moves too fast for discipline."
Reality: AI moves too fast **without** discipline.
The next model drop could change everything. If you don't have tests, evals, and safety checks, you'll spend more time debugging than building. Engineering discipline isn't overhead—it's the only way to move fast sustainably.
TDD for AI
You're not unit-testing the model. That's not your job, and it's not possible anyway. You're testing the **system around the model**:
What you test
What you don't test
The pipeline
Here's what a production AI pipeline looks like:
Push → Typecheck → Lint → Unit Tests → Golden Evals → Budget Check → PR Preview → Merge → Deploy → Observability
Every step is automated. Every gate is explicit. Every failure blocks the deploy.
The pieces
1. **Typecheck + lint** — catch dumb mistakes immediately
2. **Unit tests** — verify your system logic works
3. **Golden evals (30–100 scenarios)** — verify the AI behavior is acceptable
4. **Budget regression check** — ensure costs haven't spiked
5. **PR preview deploy** — see the change in a real environment
6. **Observability** — traces and alerts for production
Why this works
When the next model drops:
Without discipline, model drops become fire drills. With discipline, they become routine upgrades.
The path forward
I build MVPs with a real delivery pipeline from day one—so you can keep shipping when the next model drop changes everything.
Book a call to discuss your current setup and where the gaps are.
Want to discuss this topic?
I'm happy to chat about how these ideas apply to your specific situation.
Book a 20-min call